Return to http://www.pickle-publishing.com/papers/jeremiah-films/response-to-video-110.htm.
## by Bob PickleAnswers to Questions Raised by: ## Jehovah's Witnesses, Cont.; Plagiarism< Prev T. of C. ... 102 103-105 106-109
As brought out under #103, F. D. Nichol's 1951 book
stated that, including loose paraphrasing, 15.35% of How about other books by Mrs. White that were not "plagiarized in" their "entirety"? Obviously, they should have an even higher percentage of original material. [p. 78] A lot of this video's problems could have been avoided if its researchers had simply
read F. D. Nichol's book
A much easier task would be for the critics to prove that 80% of her writings were not her own. Yet that would be such a time-consuming task, they would not likely attempt it. Another way to put it is, Would it be more appropriate to say, "Prove that 20% of the Gospel of Luke is original," or more appropriate to say, "Prove that 80% of the Gospel of Luke is not original." The latter approach would be more appropriate, because the former would be impossible to prove. Here's a different sort of challenge for Jeremiah Films: Prove that 20% of the information contained in this video is both accurate and relevant. Try to respond within twenty years. Since it's going on three years since this writer contacted you, you still have seventeen to go.
< Prev T. of C. ... 102 103-105 106-109 © 2005 Pickle Publishing |